Dr. Cheah’s Pages

“Saifool” profile

As his testimony continues, one starts to wonder if there is indeed a shred of truth in this young man.

The casual manner to which Anwar posed his question appears too frank. Even if Anwar was indeed interested, he would have made suggestive advances prior rather than a point blank question. Either Anwar was foolish (hey how many men have approached women asking them ”can I have sex with you?”) or this is entirely a charade.

When Anwar ”popped” the question, the normal response would be that of shock and disbelief. He would not have known what to do or react. If he has never performed carnal intercourse, he will be literally dumbfounded. Conversely, he mentioned that he complied and even went to wash himself. Either he is a habitual homosexual or clearly it was following a script.

For someone that has been sexually violated, he appears too jovial and upbeat. His mannerisms reflect someone who is eager to get on with the job NOT having to relive the mental torture of that fateful day. Most sexual victims will be very reclusive and will certainly be traumatised by the fact that they will have to highlight every single detail of this sexual encounter! From the looks of it, Saifool was eager to give his testimony even if it was in plain view of the court audience and press!

Saifool certainly does not fit the profile of someone who has been forcibly sodomised.